The typical politician hates historic America

We will get to the professional liar, Sen Mitchell, shortly but first a few reactions his crummy column elicited.

ABS is a Native American in the fullest sense of those words for he was born in America and one can not get more native than that. 


ABS was born into a nation that was 90% white and objectively Christian but our crummy overlords have been working diligently to destroy us by having us become Yugoslavia, multiracial, multicultural, multireligious, etc (how'd that work out for Yugoslavia?)

O, maybe you are thinking of the political classification where, the fetid political class uses words (Native American) that have a gnostic meaning differing from the obvious plain meaning of those words for if one is not counted as a native when he is born in a particular country, then one knows the political class is lying to him and trying to disappear him.

 O.E.D.  NATION A large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular state or territory.

 https://tinyurl.com/yb5uzwon

We are not a nation of immigrants as the political class claims, unless one ignores the Federalist Papers, one of which references a colonial people united in race and language and culture..

With equal pleasure I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people--a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence.


As an aside, it is interesting to note that when it comes to slavery (we are ALWAYS talking about slavery in this crummy country) one never is presumed to be referencing white slaves (slav is the root) who were working in the northern factories while the hypocritical abolitionists were agitating over liberating the negro slaves only because their liberation in the south would not hurt their bottomline in the north; they could have freed the white slaves, but, they didn't care about slaves qua slaves but only about their wealth which the insane Yankees deemed a sign of their divine election.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 What did a few of our founding Fathers think of exotic foreigners arriving to change the country and culture?

Why should the Palatine Boors be suffered to swarm into our settlements, and by herding together establish their languages and manners to the exclusion of ours? Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our language or customs, any more than they can acquire our complexion?

—Ben Franklin, Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, 1751


The policy or advantage of [immigration] taking place in a body (I mean the settling of them in a body) may be much questioned; for, by so doing, they retain the language, habits, and principles (good or bad) which they bring with them. Whereas by an intermixture with our people, they, or their descendants, get assimilated to our customs, measures, and laws: in a word, soon become one people.

—George Washington, letter to John Adams, November 15, 1794

Although as to other foreigners it is thought better to discourage their settling together in large masses, wherein, as in our German settlements, they preserve for a long time their own languages, habits, and principles of government, and that they should distribute themselves sparsely among the natives for quicker amalgamation, yet English emigrants are without this inconvenience.

—Thomas Jefferson, letter to George Flower, 1817

+++++++++++++++++++++

 Well, ok, then, but what about the Founding Fathers and their first bits of legislation having to do with foreigners arriving here; surely they were like the politicians of today willing to take all manner of men unable to speak the language, listless, indolent, ill, who are moving here with no relatives or even the slightest chance of employment?

 O, nope, not quite:
Federal naturalization laws (1790, 1795).
United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization” 
(March 26, 1790).
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, 
in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided 
within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years,
 may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of 
record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at
 least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court  that he is a person of good 
character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law to support the Constitution
 of the United States, which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer, and the Clerk
 of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon 
such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States.  And the children of
 such person so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of
 twenty one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens 
of the United States.  And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born
 beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born
 Citizens:  Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers
 have never been resident in the United States:  Provided also, that no person heretofore
 proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an Act of the
 Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed.


United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform rule of Naturalization; and to repeal the act heretofore passed on that subject” (January 29, 1795).
For carrying into complete effect the power given by the constitution, to establish an uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States: 
SEC.1.  Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any alien, being a free white person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them, on the following conditions, and not otherwise: --
First.  He shall have declared, on oath or affirmation, before the supreme, superior, district, or circuit court of some one of the states, or of the territories northwest or south of the river Ohio, or a circuit or district court of the United States, three years, at least, before his admission, that it was bona fide, his intention to become a citizen of the United States, and to renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty whatever, and particularly, by name, the prince, potentate, state or sovereignty whereof such alien may, at that time, be a citizen or subject.
Secondly.  He shall, at the time of his application to be admitted, declare on oath or affirmation before some one of the courts aforesaid, that he has resided within the United States, five years at least, and within the state or territory, where such court is at the time held, one year at least; that he will support the constitution of the United States; and that he does absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty whatever, and particularly by name, the prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, whereof he was before a citizen or subject; which proceedings shall be recorded by the clerk of the court.
Thirdly.  The court admitting such alien shall be satisfied that he has resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States five years; and it shall further appear to their satisfaction, that during that time, he has behaved as a man of a good moral character, attached to the principles of the constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same.
Fourthly.  In case the alien applying to be admitted to citizenship shall have borne any hereditary title, or been of any of the orders of nobility, in the kingdom or state from which he came, he shall, in addition to the above requisites, make an express renunciation of his title or order of nobility, in the court to which his application shall be made; which renunciation shall be recorded in the said court.
SEC. 2.  Provided always, and be it further enacted, That any alien now residing within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States may be admitted to become a citizen on his declaring, on oath or affirmation, in some one of the courts aforesaid, that he has resided two years, at least, within and under the jurisdiction of the same, and one year, at least, within the state or territory where such court is at the time held; that he will support the constitution of the United States; and that he does absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty whatever, and particularly by name the prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, whereof he was before a citizen or subject; and moreover, on its appearing to the satisfaction of the court, that during the said term of two years, he has behaved as a man of good moral character, attached to the constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same; and when the alien applying for admission to citizenship, shall have borne any hereditary title, or been of any of the orders of nobility in the kingdom or state from which he came, on his moreover making in the court an express renunciation of his title or order of nobility, before he shall be entitled to such admission; all of which proceedings, required in this proviso to be performed in the court, shall be recorded by the clerk thereof.
SEC. 3.  And be it further enacted, that the children of persons duly naturalized, dwelling within the United States, and being under the age of twenty-one years, at the time of such naturalization, and the children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States:   Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident of the United States:  Provided also, That no person heretofore proscribed by any state, or who has been legally convicted of having joined the army of Great Britain during the late war, shall be admitted a citizen as foresaid, without the consent of the legislature of the state, in which such person was proscribed.
SEC. 4.  And be it further enacted, That the Act intituled, “An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization,” passed the twenty-sixth day of March, one thousand seven hundred and ninety, be, and the same is hereby repealed.

 +++++++++++++++++++





The Examination Number VIII, [12 January 1802]








The Examination.1
number viii.







[New York, January 12, 1802]
Resuming the subject of our last paper we proceed to trace still farther, the consequences that must result from a too unqualified admission of foreigners, to an equal participation in our civil, and political rights.

The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common National sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias, and prejudice; and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education and family.
The opinion advanced in the Notes on Virginia2 is undoubtedly correct, that foreigners will generally be apt to bring with them attachments to the persons they have left behind; to the country of their nativity, and to its particular customs and manners. They will also entertain opinions on government congenial with those under which they have lived, or if they should be led hither from a preference to ours, how extremely unlikely is it that they will bring with them that temperate love of liberty, so essential to real republicanism? There may as to particular individuals, and at particular times, be occasional exceptions to these remarks, yet such is the general rule. The influx of foreigners must, therefore, tend to produce a heterogeneous compound; to change and corrupt the national spirit; to complicate and confound public opinion; to introduce foreign propensities. In the composition of society, the harmony of the ingredients is all important, and whatever tends to a discordant intermixture must have an injurious tendency.
The United States have already felt the evils of incorporating a large number of foreigners into their national mass; it has served very much to divide the community and to distract our councils, by promoting in different classes different predilections in favor of particular foreign nations, and antipathies against others. It has been often likely to compromit the interests of our own country in favor of another. In times of great public danger there is always a numerous body of men, of whom there may be just grounds of distrust; the suspicion alone weakens the strength of the nation, but their force may be actually employed in assisting an invader.
In the infancy of the country, with a boundless waste to people, it was politic to give a facility to naturalization;3 but our situation is now changed. It appears from the last census, that we have increased about one third in ten years;4 after allowing for what we have gained from abroad, it will be quite apparent that the natural progress of our own population is sufficiently rapid for strength, security and settlement. By what has been said, it is not meant to contend for a total prohibition of the right of citizenship to strangers, nor even for the very long residence which is now a prerequisite to naturalization, and which of itself, goes far towards a denial of that privilege. The present law was merely a temporary measure adopted under peculiar circumstances and perhaps demands revision.5 But there is a wide difference between closing the door altogether and throwing it entirely open; between a postponement of fourteen years and an immediate admission to all the rights of citizenship. Some reasonable term ought to be allowed to enable aliens to get rid of foreign and acquire American attachments; to learn the principles and imbibe the spirit of our government; and to admit of at least a probability of their feeling a real interest in our affairs. A residence of at least five years ought to be required.
If the rights of Naturalization may be communicated by parts, and it is not perceived why they may not, those peculiar to the conducting of business and the acquisition of property, might with propriety be at once conferred, upon receiving proof, by certain prescribed solemnities, of their intention to become citizens; postponing all political privileges to the ultimate term. To admit foreigners indiscriminately to the rights of citizens, the moment they put foot in our country, as recommended in the Message, would be nothing less, than to admit the Grecian Horse into the Citadel of our Liberty and Sovereignty.
lucius crassus.
Alexander Hamilton writing as Lucius...

+++++++++++++++++++++

These quotes could be multiplied scores of times but what has been posted so far ought to be convincing that the politicians are prolly both ignorant and liars but, in any event, an intentionally inferior public school education (The establishment desires dolts because they are easier to manipulate) leaves the individual man with a sense of helplessness against the avalanche of propagandistic lies he is daily buried under and so he must become an autodidact and teach his own self the truth for, daily, he is inundated with the type of fetid bull shit former Senator George Mitchell was dishing out in the Bangor Daily News recently...




America was NOT formed around ideals and Mitchell is a mischievous miscreant who deserves tar and feathers not praise and a public platform to lie with abandon to we once free men.

 ABS will close with this quote to be used as a lifeline to lift your own self out of the quicksand of white guilt that seeks your surrender or death:
Ernest Van Den Haag wrote:


One need not believe that one’s own ethnic group, or any ethnic group, is superior to others...in order to wish one’s country to continue to be made up of the same ethnic strains in the same proportions as before. And, conversely, the wish not to see one’s country overrun by groups one regards as alien need not be based on feelings of superiority or “racism”...the wish to preserve one’s identity and the identity of one’s nation requires no justification...any more than the wish to have one’s own children, and to continue one’s family through them need be justified or rationalized by a belief that they are superior to the children of others.”

Now, let's end with a song; a song that references America and what the Founding Fathers of America - all free white men - intended for this country.

This was to be a land of liberty to be secured and then passed on to THEIR posterity - not to those who hate historic America and seeks its destruction: