Say 'dere. Was the Last Supper/First Mass a seder? (1)

Far be it from ABS to be provocative, but what is it with the Judaising he sees all around him?

Yesterday, ABS posted his complaints and critique of the way the V2 rocket revolutionaries assassinated the beautiful living Tradition of the prayers of The Offertory and replaced them with the corpse of a Jewish meal prayer because nothing says Tradition more than assassinating it and replacing it with the prayers of the Messias-Deniers.

Today, ABS is going to begin take a look at the false claim that The Last Supper/First Mass was a Seder and which false claim has been used to justify the Iconoclastic attack on the Mass - the Living Tradition of Saint and Sinners.

And the way he will do it is to begin by citing Denzinger's Sources of Catholic Dogma condemning Judaising as a serious sin:


712 It firmly believes, professes, and teaches that the matter pertaining to the law of the Old Testament, of the Mosiac law, which are divided into ceremonies, sacred rites, sacrifices, and sacraments, because they were established to signify something in the future, although they were suited to the divine worship at that time, after our Lord's coming had been signified by them, ceased, and the sacraments of the New Testament began; and that whoever, even after the passion, placed hope in these matters of the law and submitted himself to them as necessary for salvation, as if faith in Christ could not save without them, sinned mortally. Yet it does not deny that after the passion of Christ up to the promulgation of the Gospel they could have been observed until they were believed to be in no way necessary for salvation; but after the promulgation of the Gospel it asserts that they cannot be observed without the loss of eternal salvation. All, therefore, who after that time observe circumcision and the Sabbath and the other requirements of the law, it declares alien to the Christian faith and not in the least fit to participate in eternal salvation, unless someday they recover from these errors. Therefore, it commands all who glory in the name of Christian, at whatever time, before or after baptism' to cease entirely from circumcision, since, whether or not one places hope in it, it cannot be observed at all without the loss of eternal salvation. Regarding children, indeed, because of danger of death, which can often take place, when no help can be brought to them by another remedy than through the sacrament of baptism, through which they are snatched from the domination of the Devil and adopted among the sons of God, it advises that holy baptism ought not to be deferred for forty or eighty days, or any time according to the observance of certain people, but it should be conferred as soon as it can be done conveniently, but so that, when danger of death is imminent, they be baptized in the form of the Church, early without delay, even by a layman or woman, if a priest should be lacking, just as is contained more fully in the decree of the Armenians [[n.. 696].


More to follow this stage setting....