Gratissimam Sane
# 17…
# 17…
While speaking about employment in reference to the family, it is appropriate to emphasize how important and burdensome is the work women do within the family unit: that work should be acknowledged and deeply appreciated. The "toil" of a woman who, having given birth to a child, nourishes and cares for that child and devotes herself to its upbringing, particularly in the early years, is so great as to be comparable to any professional work. This ought to be clearly stated and upheld, no less than any other labour right. Motherhood, because of all the hard work it entails, should be recognized as giving the right to financial benefits at least equal to those of other kinds of work undertaken in order to support the family during such a delicate phase of its life.
https://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/letters/1994/documents/hf_jp-ii_let_02021994_families.html
https://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/letters/1994/documents/hf_jp-ii_let_02021994_families.html
The Stupid Party will not touch this truth with a ten foot pole as its usury-economics hates this true observation. It would much rather have a Husband/Father competing with the Wife/Mother in the work place because such competition keeps wages low.
But what about the kids?
The Kids are all right. Strangers can raise them in Day Care Centers and the State can corrupt them in their crummy pre-schools.
The Evil party would not touch this with a ten foot pole because ideological feminism but where is the man or woman courageous enough and sensible enough to include pay for Mothers as part of their campaign platform?
He who champions this will never tire of winning...