ABS is sorry to have to break this news to Tradistan (tm Rad Trad) but it has recently come to his attention that Pope Saint Pius X must be considered a fake Pope because he changed what sedes claim could not be changed.
Of course, what Pope Saint Pius X changed was every bit as irreformable, per the sedes, as Quo Primum - and it even had the exact same wording in the final paragraph warning the promulgation of Quod a vobis was a decision to remain "forever..."
Quod a vobis (Breviary) had the exact same wording as in its crucial part as did Quo Primum - not surprising as both were promulgated by Pope Saint Pius V, who was just employing the then papal rhetorical boilerplate - but Pope Saint Pius X DID change Qoud a vobis, so he is a heretic and, thus, was never a legitimate Pope, or something...
Pages 53-59
Poor Pope Saint Pius X, he seemed like such a nice Saintly Pope, still sedes rule...
ABS could have presented this in a more pacific way but what fun is that?
He assumes sedes know he loves them and desires they return to the fulness of faith and catholic form but he also understands the time of trial they are undergoing and the sort of obstacles placed in their path towards reconciliation and it is fun to have those obstacles blowed-up.
So, why does he have to be so provocative about them?
Essentially, it is because ABS is, at heart, a jerk.
Poor Pope Saint Pius X, he seemed like such a nice Saintly Pope, still sedes rule...
ABS could have presented this in a more pacific way but what fun is that?
He assumes sedes know he loves them and desires they return to the fulness of faith and catholic form but he also understands the time of trial they are undergoing and the sort of obstacles placed in their path towards reconciliation and it is fun to have those obstacles blowed-up.
So, why does he have to be so provocative about them?
Essentially, it is because ABS is, at heart, a jerk.