It is prolly best to begin with a definition of a holocaust:
Among the Israelites and even now among many non-Christian believers, an offering entirely consumed by fire. In Jewish tradition, only animals could be offered in holocaust, which is regarded as the most complete expression of one's reverence for God. A holocaust could either be prescribed by law or voluntarily made in fulfillment of a private vow or as an act of devotion. In the Old Testament, holocausts were vivid reminders of God's supreme dominion over his creatures. They were means of atonement for sin, and they foreshadowed the perfect sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the Cross. (Etym. Greek holokaustos, burned whole.)
Now, up until WWII, we Christian Catholics (We who follow Jesus in the universal Church He established) not only held that belief corporately, but we were repeatedly taught that by our Popes, Princes, Prelates, and Priests.
And it was because this truth was repeatedly taught - Repetitio est mater studiorum - that, morally speaking, The Catholic Church could not be
driven off this truthful ground of belief.
But, that has all changed now, hasn't it? Our new
orientation is that there is a new holocaust that needs
addressing and we are repeatedly told that we must never forget and that we must go along with its absurd charge (psychological projection) that we are responsible for the holocaust (Jews always innocent, Catholics always guilty).
Here is just one example (although many more could be produced) of such by one of the so-called gang of eight, Sean Cardinal o'Malley, who identified the mass murders of Jews by the Nazis the worst crime in history.
http://www.vosizneias.com/27965/2009/02/24/boston-ma-catholic-cardinal-to-jews-holocaust-the-worst-crime-in-human-history/
Well, Amateur Brain Surgeon calls such Cultural Marxist bowing and scraping before the Messias-Deniers an abomination worthy of excommunication were he Pope.
What happened to the Jews during World War Two is not even morally discernible when compared to the worst crime in history - Deicide, - but to state that what happened to the Jews in WW2 is the worst crime in history is to
denigrate the only act worthy of the name, Holocaust, if that word is to have any historical and true definition.
What? You think the Nazi's, in killing Jews, were actualising that which was a type in the old testament? Did God choose the Nazis to sacrifice sinful Jews as the way to actualise Salvation? Were the Jews offering themselves as a salvific sacrifice?
Those are a few of the unavoidable intellectual consequences deriving from the idea that war crimes are a holocaust.
Please. Such an idea would have to have a dozen weather balloons attached to it just so it could rise to the level of absurdity.
So let's just go back in time a bit...to a time when the liberalism we now suffer under was dutifully ascending into its mephitic power.
Even prior to WWII, we Catholics had publicly
addressed our complicated relationship with the
Messiah-Deniers in a fashion that revealed our
already liberalised inclinations.
(Pope Pius X condemned that liberalism as,
Modernism).
In any event, one expression of that
liberalism/modernism was, the Opus Sacerdotal
Amici Israel movement that was then gaining great
favor amongst the mighty within the Church before
its ideological inclinations (innocent Jews, guilty
Catholics) were scotched by the great Rafael Maria
Jose Pedro Francisco Borja Gerardo de la Santissima
Trinidad Merry del Val y Zulueta; Cardinal
Merry del Val.
It was a movement that, while it began with positive
motives (as did the Liturgical Movement), began to
be corrupted by liberals/modernists and it sought,
among other things, to change the prayers of Holy
Mass to please the Messias-Deniers as if not
irritating any group of persons could be the purpose
of any Holy Mass (pace Pauline Rite)..
Here is the decree ditching that expression of
liberalism/modernism
THE DECREE OF THE HOLY OFFICE ABOLISHING AMICI ISRAEL ASSOCIATION (MARCH 25, 1928)
“The nature and purpose of the association called” Friends of Israel “was submitted to the judgment of the Congregation of the Holy Office, and a booklet entitled Pax super Israel , edited for this purpose [ idcirco ] by management and spread extensively to better understanding of the characteristics and method, attendants Eminent Fathers to guard the faith and morals were first recognized the commendable side of this association, which is to urge faithful to pray and work for the conversion of Jews to the reign of Christ. It is not surprising that at the beginning, this association having in mind that this single purpose, not only many faithful and priests, but many bishops, have acceded. The Catholic Church, in fact, has always been used to pray for the Jewish people, which was the custodian of the divine promises up to Jesus Christ, despite the continual blindness of that people, even more, because even this blindness. With what charity the Apostolic See has he not protected the same people against unjust vexations!Because it rejects all hatred and animosities between peoples, condemning the utmost hatred against the people formerly chosen by God, this hatred that today we usually refer to as an “anti-Semitism “. However, noticing and considering that this association “Friends of Israel” then adopted a way of acting and thinking contrary to the meaning and spirit of the Church, at the thought of the Holy Fathers and the liturgy, the Eminent Fathers, having received the votes of Consultors of the Plenary Meeting of 21 March 1928, decreed that the association of the “Friends of Israel” should be deleted. They declared effectively abolished, and prescribed that no one in the future, will allow to write or edit books or pamphlets to promote nature in any way similar erroneous initiatives. The following Thursday, 22nd of the same month of the same year, in the audience granted to the Assessor of the Holy Office, the Holy Father Pius XI Pope by Divine Providence, approved the decision of the Fathers and Eminent ordered its publication. Given in Rome, at the Palace of the Holy Office, 25 March 1928. ”
If
we were to change [the prayer] it would appear that the Church had
erred up to now,” the Pope said
But we know that Liberalism/Modernism was aught but suppressed within the Church and never defeated and so we see its corrosive denaturing of Catholicism achieving its malign triumphalism wherein the Holocaust of Jesus Christ has been replaced by the war crimes the Nazis visited upon the Jews.
Whereas it was once an openly acknowledged plain and simple truth amongst Catholics that the Passion and Death of Our Lord and Saviour was The Holocaust, see below for an example:
Pierre Barbet, M.D. A Doctor at Calvary
such an understanding about THE HOLOCAUST has been reduced to a recondite reality amongst a handful of traditionalists.
But what about the definition about the Holocaust being a burnt offering, you ask?
Well, it was the burning charity of Jesus which took the place of material fire:
It is the Fiery Charity of Jesus that replaced the material fire...
http://www.romancatholicism.org/pdf/civilta-jews.pdf
But, few then listened and fewer have ears and eyes open to the truth now.
Look, it is plain and simple, the Messias-Deniers are also Holocaust Deniers in that they reject Jesus as their Messias and their Savior.
Messiah: The Hebrew word for "Anointed One." The equivalent word in Greek is Christos. In the Old Testament it was sometimes applied in a general sense to prophets or priests (Exodus 30:30), but more specifically it referred to the coming of one who would usher in a period of righteousness and conquer sin and evil (Daniel 9:26). In the New Testament the Evangelists made it clear that they knew Jesus was the long-anticipated Messiah (Acts 2:36; Matthew 16:17; Galatians 3:24-29). Those who refused to accept Jesus interpreted the promised kingdom to be a worldly domain and looked forward to a messiah who would be a military leader to help Israel triumph over her enemies.
The Jews are forever drowning in a racial supremacist quicksand, always asking - Is it good for the Jews? - for it is always about them.
A column from Rabbi Gellman serves as an instructive lesson:
Pierre Barbet, M.D. A Doctor at Calvary
such an understanding about THE HOLOCAUST has been reduced to a recondite reality amongst a handful of traditionalists.
But what about the definition about the Holocaust being a burnt offering, you ask?
Well, it was the burning charity of Jesus which took the place of material fire:
Article
3. Whether Christ's Passion operated by way of sacrifice?
Objection
1. It
would seem that Christ's Passion did
not operate by way of sacrifice. For the truth should
correspond with the figure. But human flesh
was never offered up in the sacrifices of
the Old
Law,
which were figures of Christ: nay,
such sacrifices were reputed as
impious, according to Psalm
105:38:
"And they shed innocent blood: the blood of their sons and of
their daughters, which they sacrificed to
the idols of Chanaan."
It seems therefore that Christ's Passion cannot
be called a sacrifice.
Objection
2. Further, Augustine says
(De Civ. Dei x) that "a visible sacrifice is
a sacrament--that
is, a sacred sign--of an invisible sacrifice."
Now Christ's
Passion is
not a sign, but rather the thing signified by other signs.
Therefore it seems that Christ's Passion is
not a sacrifice.
Objection
3. Further,
whoever offers sacrifice performs some sacred rite,
as the very word "sacrifice" shows. But
those men who slew Christ did not perform
any sacred act, but rather wrought a great wrong.
Therefore Christ's
Passion was
rather a malefice than a sacrifice.
On
the contrary, The Apostle says
(Ephesians
5:2):
"He delivered Himself up for us, an oblation and
a sacrifice to God for
an odor of sweetness."
I
answer that, A sacrifice properly
so called is something done for that honor which
is properly due to God,
in order to appease Him: and hence it is that Augustine says
(De Civ. Dei x): "A true sacrifice is
every good work
done in order that we may cling to God in holy fellowship,
yet referred to that consummation of happiness wherein
we can be truly blessed."
But, as is added in the same place, "Christ offered Himself
up for us in the Passion":
and this voluntary enduring
of the Passion was
most acceptable to God,
as coming from charity.
Therefore it is manifest that Christ's Passion was
a true sacrifice.
Moreover, as Augustine says
farther on in the same book, "the
primitive sacrifices of
the holy Fathers were
many and various signs of this true sacrifice,
one being prefigured by many, in the same way as a single concept of
thought is expressed in many words, in order to commend it without
tediousness":
and, as Augustine observe,
(De Trin. iv), "since there are four things to be noted in
every sacrifice--to wit, to whom it is offered, by whom it
is offered, what is offered, and for whom it
is offered--that the same one true Mediator reconciling
us with God through
the peace-sacrifice might continue to be one with Him to whom
He offered it, might be one with them for whom
He offered it, and might Himself be the offerer and what
He offered."
Reply
to Objection 1. Although
the truth answers
to the figure in some respects, yet it does not in all, since
the truth must
go beyond the figure. Therefore the figure of this sacrifice, in
which Christ's flesh
is offered, was flesh right fittingly, not the flesh
of men,
but of animals, as denoting Christ's. And this is a most perfect
sacrifice. First of all, since being flesh of human nature,
it is fittingly offered for men, and is partaken of by
them under the Sacrament. Secondly,
because being passible and mortal, it was fit for immolation.
Thirdly, because, being sinless, it had virtue to
cleanse from sins.
Fourthly, because, being the offerer's own flesh, it was acceptable
to God on
account of His charity in offering up
His own flesh. Hence it is that Augustine says
(De Trin. iv): "What else could be so fittingly partaken of
by men,
or offered up for men, as human flesh?
What else could be so appropriate for this immolation as mortal
flesh? What else is there so clean for cleansing mortals as
the flesh born in the womb without fleshly concupiscence,
and coming from a virginal womb? What could be so
favorably offered and accepted as the flesh of
our sacrifice, which was made the body of our Priest?"
Reply
to Objection 2. Augustine is
speaking there of visible figurative sacrifices:
and even Christ's
Passion,
although denoted by other figurative sacrifices,
is yet a sign of something to be observed by us, according to 1
Peter 4:1:
"Christ therefore,
having suffered in the flesh, be you also armed with the same
thought: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased
from sins:
that now he may live the rest of his time in the flesh, not
after the desires of men,
but according to the will of God."
Reply
to Objection 3. Christ's Passion was
indeed a malefice on His slayers' part; but
on His own it was the sacrifice of one suffering out
of charity.
Hence it is Christ who
is said to have offered this sacrifice, and not
the executioners.
It is the Fiery Charity of Jesus that replaced the material fire...
Malign Modernism is triumphant during this execrable ecclesiastical epoch but Amateur Brain Surgeon will, to the extent he is aware of it, repudiate it and all of its satanic promises of a faux anthropocentric peace with the permanent enemies of Jesus, The Messias-Deniers, and while Amateur Brain Surgeon loves the Jews, he will not supplant THE HOLOCAUST with the faux worship of Holocaustry for it was the best and the then brightest of the Catholic Church - The Jesuits - who warned all about the grave trouble headed the Jews way if the Christian nations of Europe did not deal with the Jews as they had to be dealt with if cataclysmic calamity was not to befall them:
October 23, 1890 La Civiltà Cattolica, on The Jewish Question
Ultimate Defense: Setting Aside Civil Equality
But as long as Christianity doesn't shed the political yoke of Masonry, it will be vain to propose and discuss possible solutions for liberation. The only solution and, at the same time the most reliable one, is to turn back and retake the way where one has gone astray. If the Hebrews are not put in their place by humane and Christian laws, certainly, but nevertheless by laws of exception which deprive them of civil equality, to which they have no right and which is even no less pernicious for them than it is for Christians, little or nothing will be accomplished. Seeing the inevitability of their presence in the various countries; seeing their unalterable nature of their being foreigners in every country, and of their being enemies of each country that tolerates them, and of their being a society always separated from the societies in which it lives; seeing the Talmud's morality that they follow, and the fundamental dogma of their religion which impels them to seize, by any means whatsoever, the goods of all peoples, because it assigns to their race the possession of, and the domination over, all the world; seeing that the experience of many centuries, and that one which we are undergoing at present, has proven and still proves, that the legal equality with Christians conceded to them in the Christian states results either in their oppression of Christians or in their slaughter by Christians, there emerges the consequence that the only way of reconciling the Hebrews' residence with the Christians' rights is to regulate it with such laws which, at the same time, impede the Hebrews from offending the Christians' welfare, and impede the Christians from offending that of the Hebrews.
And this is just what, in a more or less perfect manner, has been done in the past; this is what, for a century, the Hebrews have tried to abolish; but this is also what, sooner or later, willingly or unwillingly, will have to be restored, and perhaps the Hebrews themselves will be constrained to ask that it be restored. For the predominance to which today's revolutionary law has helped them is digging an abyss under their feet, whose depth corresponds to the height to which they have risen. And at the first burst of the storm they are provoking by their very predominance at present, they will suffer such an enormous ruin, heralding an event as unequaled in their history as their modern audacity is also unequaled and with which they have trampled the nations that have madly exalted them.
On January 30, 1930, German President Paul Von Hindenburg named Adolph Hitler Chancellor – only forty years after the official Catholic Church's media organ, La Civilta Cattolica , issued its onimous warning
October 23, 1890 La Civiltà Cattolica, on The Jewish Question
Ultimate Defense: Setting Aside Civil Equality
But as long as Christianity doesn't shed the political yoke of Masonry, it will be vain to propose and discuss possible solutions for liberation. The only solution and, at the same time the most reliable one, is to turn back and retake the way where one has gone astray. If the Hebrews are not put in their place by humane and Christian laws, certainly, but nevertheless by laws of exception which deprive them of civil equality, to which they have no right and which is even no less pernicious for them than it is for Christians, little or nothing will be accomplished. Seeing the inevitability of their presence in the various countries; seeing their unalterable nature of their being foreigners in every country, and of their being enemies of each country that tolerates them, and of their being a society always separated from the societies in which it lives; seeing the Talmud's morality that they follow, and the fundamental dogma of their religion which impels them to seize, by any means whatsoever, the goods of all peoples, because it assigns to their race the possession of, and the domination over, all the world; seeing that the experience of many centuries, and that one which we are undergoing at present, has proven and still proves, that the legal equality with Christians conceded to them in the Christian states results either in their oppression of Christians or in their slaughter by Christians, there emerges the consequence that the only way of reconciling the Hebrews' residence with the Christians' rights is to regulate it with such laws which, at the same time, impede the Hebrews from offending the Christians' welfare, and impede the Christians from offending that of the Hebrews.
And this is just what, in a more or less perfect manner, has been done in the past; this is what, for a century, the Hebrews have tried to abolish; but this is also what, sooner or later, willingly or unwillingly, will have to be restored, and perhaps the Hebrews themselves will be constrained to ask that it be restored. For the predominance to which today's revolutionary law has helped them is digging an abyss under their feet, whose depth corresponds to the height to which they have risen. And at the first burst of the storm they are provoking by their very predominance at present, they will suffer such an enormous ruin, heralding an event as unequaled in their history as their modern audacity is also unequaled and with which they have trampled the nations that have madly exalted them.
On January 30, 1930, German President Paul Von Hindenburg named Adolph Hitler Chancellor – only forty years after the official Catholic Church's media organ, La Civilta Cattolica , issued its onimous warning
http://www.romancatholicism.org/pdf/civilta-jews.pdf
But, few then listened and fewer have ears and eyes open to the truth now.
Look, it is plain and simple, the Messias-Deniers are also Holocaust Deniers in that they reject Jesus as their Messias and their Savior.
Messiah: The Hebrew word for "Anointed One." The equivalent word in Greek is Christos. In the Old Testament it was sometimes applied in a general sense to prophets or priests (Exodus 30:30), but more specifically it referred to the coming of one who would usher in a period of righteousness and conquer sin and evil (Daniel 9:26). In the New Testament the Evangelists made it clear that they knew Jesus was the long-anticipated Messiah (Acts 2:36; Matthew 16:17; Galatians 3:24-29). Those who refused to accept Jesus interpreted the promised kingdom to be a worldly domain and looked forward to a messiah who would be a military leader to help Israel triumph over her enemies.
The Jews are forever drowning in a racial supremacist quicksand, always asking - Is it good for the Jews? - for it is always about them.
A column from Rabbi Gellman serves as an instructive lesson:
http://www.dailypilot.com/entertainment/tn-dpt-et-0403-god-squad-20150403,0,3921750.story
Y'all can do as you desire but Amateur Brain Surgeon confesses, believes, and tries to teach others that there is ONLY ONE HOLOCAUST; THE SALVIFIC HOLY SACRIFICE OF JESUS CHRIST ON CALVARY and Re-presented at Mass.
He who says Holocaust must be speaking about Jesus Christ on Calvary and His Pluperfect Sacrifice of Salvation and/or Mass.
anything else is benighted bunk demanded of us by politically oriented Popes, Princes, Prelates, and Priests; and on earth there will never be a pair of ears that will hear Amateur Brain Surgeon confess such a lie as that proposed by Sean Cardinal O'Malley and the like.
Y'all can do as you desire but Amateur Brain Surgeon confesses, believes, and tries to teach others that there is ONLY ONE HOLOCAUST; THE SALVIFIC HOLY SACRIFICE OF JESUS CHRIST ON CALVARY and Re-presented at Mass.
He who says Holocaust must be speaking about Jesus Christ on Calvary and His Pluperfect Sacrifice of Salvation and/or Mass.
anything else is benighted bunk demanded of us by politically oriented Popes, Princes, Prelates, and Priests; and on earth there will never be a pair of ears that will hear Amateur Brain Surgeon confess such a lie as that proposed by Sean Cardinal O'Malley and the like.