ESPN and the Second Commandment

Dan LeBatard routinely crucifies the Second Commandment but woe betide the ESPN host who uses the word, Fag, or, Nigga, for those are words proscribed by the Messias-Denier who owns ESPN, the head honcho of Disney, Mr. Iger.

http://www.timesofisrael.com/who-said-jews-run-hollywood/

There is no Iger Sanction concerning the routine crucifying of the Holy Name, Jesus, on ESPN by the prickly and portly progressive, Dan LeBatard, but let him mock Israel or Rabbis and his arrogant ass would be scraped raw after he was tossed out of the studio inside The Clevelander Hotel in Miami.

There is an Iger sanction for anyone who mocks negroes or faggots

ESPN Suspended Commentator Who Called Former Golden State Warriors Coach a “Bible-Pounding Phony”

January 25, 2016 by Hemant Mehta 29 Comments

If you know anything about basketball, it might be that the Golden State Warriors, led by last year’s MVP Steph Curry, is by far the most dominant team in the league right now. They won the NBA championship last year and they’re well on their way to repeating this year.

Head coach Steve Kerr and his assistant Luke Walton, who took over while Kerr was on medical leave this year, have been incredible. They’ve turned the team from one you rarely thought about to one you can’t stop watching.

Kerr got the coaching gig last year after the team’s management fired his predecessor Mark Jackson. So it’s worth asking: Does the team’s success now suggest that Jackson was a bad coach?

Earlier this month, that question was posed to Boston Globe columnist Bob Ryan on the Dan Le Batard Show, and Ryan was extremely blunt with his answer, reflecting on what he was thinking two years earlier:

… [The Warriors are] doing okay, but I know they can do better. I know if they had a real coach, not some phony, Bible-pounding phony that Mark Jackson is, you know, when he isn’t even a legitimate Bible-pounder, I’m telling you, I know they’ll be better off…

[Dan Le Batard: I mean, Bob, that was savage, what you just did. A “legitimate Bible pounder”?]

Yeah, because he’s a phony. That’s all. Well, I’m sorry, but it’s the truth. And I can’t believe they took him back on that broadcast. Oh my God. He’s a con man, and he’s done very well at it. I’ll give him credit for being a great one.

Some context for those remarks: Jackson is a church pastor who often preached on the sidewalks. (He’s one of those types.) But at the same time, he was in the news after his stripper-mistress tried to extort money from him using a dick pic that he sent her.

So maybe his comments weren’t all that off-base. But because he punched below the belt, ESPN apparently suspended Bob Ryan from television appearances on their network for most of this month. He finally returned yesterday, telling The Big Lead:

… it was an “intemperate, foolish outburst that I regret. I was treated very nicely by the company, and have told them that I will not do anything like this again to be out of their good graces.”

The apology isn’t surprising. The weeks-long suspension wasn’t for criticizing Jackson’s abilities as a coach, but for bringing his faith into it and turning it into a personal attack. I have no problem with him being temporarily punished for that.

Remember: Last year, ESPN suspended baseball announcer Curt Schilling in a similar way after he tweeted an image comparing Muslims to Nazis.

There’s an important lesson to be learned here: If you’re an ESPN commentator and you want to mock someone’s faith, just do it in a passive-aggressive way and everything will be just fine.

No, you dont have to be passive-agressive. All you have to do is take the Holy Name of Jesus in vain and there will be no problemo.

Canon Law revision proposal

A revision of Canon Law must be undertaken to formally secure the unspoken pretensions of haughty liturgists who think they know more than all who lived before them.


This poorly reasoned canon...

Can. 2 For the most part the Code does not define the rites which must be observed in celebrating liturgical actions. Therefore, liturgical laws in force until now retain their force unless one of them is contrary to the canons of the Code.

must be "revised" to this

Canon 2  Liturgical Laws now in place must be immediately replaced by what experts desire during this epic epicene epoch but these changes must be extinguished every 20 years to make way for the next changes demanded by the succeeding generation of haughty liturgists who will know more than the haughty and holy experts of today.

America is neo-yugoslavia not a nation

Meet the new America, same as the old Yugoslavia where diversity was not strength.

diversity plus proximity equals war

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/02/debate-jack-murphy-vs-vox-day.html

nation (n.)

c. 1300, from Old French nacion "birth, rank; descendants, relatives; country, homeland" (12c.) and directly from Latin nationem (nominative natio) "birth, origin; breed, stock, kind, species; race of people, tribe," literally "that which has been born," from natus, past participle of nasci "be born" (Old Latin gnasci; see genus). Political sense has gradually predominated, but earliest English examples inclined toward the racial meaning "large group of people with common ancestry." Older sense preserved in application to North American Indian peoples (1640s). Nation-building first attested 1907 (implied in nation-builder).

A large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular state or territory:

NATION

BOOK KEYWORDS FOR AMERICAN CULTURAL STUDIES

BY ALYS EVE WEINBAUM

“Nation” has been in use in the English language since the fourteenth century, when it was first deployed to designate groups and populations. Although the concept of “race” was not well defined in this period, the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) retrospectively refers to such groups and populations as “racial” in character. In the modern period, the OED continues, the meaning of “nation” came to refer to large aggregates of people closely associated through a combination of additional factors, including common language, politics, culture, history, and occupation of the same territory. Though it appears that an initial racial connection among nationals was later supplanted by a widened range of associating factors, the early understanding of “nation” as based in race and “common descent” remains central to discussions of the term to this day, either as a retrospective imposition of the sort orchestrated by the OED or as a “natural” …

It has often given me pleasure to observe that independent America was not composed of detached and distant territories, but that one connected, fertile, widespreading country was the portion of our western sons of liberty. Providence has in a particular manner blessed it with a variety of soils and productions, and watered it with innumerable streams, for the delight and accommodation of its inhabitants. A succession of navigable waters forms a kind of chain round its borders, as if to bind it together; while the most noble rivers in the world, running at convenient distances, present them with highways for the easy communication of friendly aids, and the mutual transportation and exchange of their various commodities. 

With equal pleasure I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people--a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence. 

This country and this people seem to have been made for each other, and it appears as if it was the design of Providence, that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, united to each other by the strongest ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed02.asp

It is claimed that we are a nation of immigrants but those who wrote the Preamble to the Constitution were not immigrants but English colonists who had purchased land from the locals.

And who were they creating this constitution for,

Burka wearing Mahometans or their (English Colonists) posterity?

Worse, economic problems, including unemployment and inflation that impoverished Yugoslavs rapidly — by the time the country went over the cliff in 1991, real incomes were half what they had been a generation before — exacerbated the country’s serious ethnic grievances. When combined with economic emergency, Yugoslavia’s ethnic politics proved a lethal combination that led directly to wars and genocide.

Yugoslavia was a very diverse country, ethnically and religiously, and the divisions between groups were real and serious. Unlike 21st century Americans, Yugoslavs were under no illusions that “diversity is our greatest strength” — they knew the opposite was the truth — and the Communists went to great lengths to keep ethnic peace by banning what we would term “hate speech” while mandating that the official doctrine that Yugoslavia’s diverse peoples really loved each other deeply be placed at the level of quasi-religious dogma.

Rewriting history, to show certain ethnic groups as victims and others as perpetrators of race-based crimes, took its toll, since Yugoslavs knew this was too simple, and was being used as a political weapon by the authorities. Aggressive “affirmative action” in education and employment — Belgrade termed it the “ethnic key” — was another perennial sore-spot for many citizens, since ethnic status and ties often mattered more than competence. Needless to add, this hardly helped the economy either.

Perhaps worst of all, by preventing any honest discussion of ethnic matters, the Communists had a perverse knack of making each of Yugoslavia’s many ethnic groups feel that it was uniquely aggrieved. Thus any Serb or Croat or Albanian or Bosnian Muslim, could look at similar events and quietly determine that his group was really the persecuted one in the Communist-mandated racial games that were enforced by the authorities.

https://20committee.com/2015/03/02/yugoslavias-warning-to-america/

Dear White People. We hate you.

ABS reached out to Angela Davis for a comment for today's post. Ms. Davis, a hero of the 1960s commie good whites, who was a professor in the History of Consciousness in the Feminist Studies Department  at the University of California, Santa Cruz, said:  WHITEY SUCKS!!!!