Making Europe into the new homeland for Mahometanism was no accident

Dear Christine,

The problem you raise: "not a conspiracy but a well programmed political policy", is essential. For if it's a conspiracy, a fantasy, then everything we see and note is imaginary and a falsification of the real. But if the current situation corresponds to a programmed policy, it implies an ideology, planning, goals and responsibilities. If Eurabia represents a policy with its finances and its networks, we can break its mechanisms and stop the process of decomposition of Europe; we can judge those responsible and the brains behind it. This would be worse than a catastrophe for the European Union and the heads of the parties that created Eurabia, or that contributed to it.

I don't believe that the Great Replacement was originally envisioned  in the politics of a Euro-Arab (Eurabia) union. There have been, since 1973, unexpected stages and developments that brought us to where we are now. But the political objectives expressed in the documents allow us to affirm, with near-certainty, the orientations of the European Community which are discernible in the Euro-Arab Dialogue and its promoters.

1) To transform Europe into a Euro-Islamic continent, through the creation of a Christian-Muslim Mediterranean civilization, hence the affirmation that Islam is as much a part of Europe as Christianity. The adoption of an open-borders immigration policy favors the mixing of populations; as does the promotion of sister cities and similar Euro-Arab projects in the information and audio-visual sectors, in the universities, in the political and economic sectors relevant to youth.

2) Massive immigration into the West, imposed by the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) because it is in conformity with jihadist doctrine, yet approved by Europe that feels it will destroy the nationalisms of the Nation-States and re-enforce the power of the EU over the member States.

3) Muslim immigration is the vector of fusion of the two shores of the Mediterranean and of the extension of Europe into Asia and Africa, thus opening up new markets, bases of economic and strategic control in the context of globalization. With Islam, Europe would become richer, more powerful than America and Russia, it would control the world (the fable of the frog who wanted to be fatter than an ox). In this sense immigration is the source of power and wealth.

4) The realization of the Nazi project dear to the hearts of Hitler and Amin al-Husseini, grand mufti of Jerusalem. The Nazis wanted to destroy a Christianity rooted in Judaism and preferred Islam. This anti-Christianism was re-enforced by the Marxist vision of mixing together people liberated from religions, nationalism, and hierarchies and fraternizing in realm of the universal.

5) Seen from this angle Israel represents the Nation-State, a thorn in the side of the EU and an obstacle to the perfect harmony between Islam and a Europe that committed itself in November 1973 to construct Palestine on the ruins of the State of Israel. The  tenacity of the Jewish State to exist on its national territory provoked a hidden strategic, political and media-supported war, by a Europe that had become a mercenary of international jihadism against Israel.

One could say that the EU and the governments that adhere to this strategy are applying a policy derived from their anti-Israel standards against the nationalist movements and those populations attached to their historical and cultural roots.

For the goal is the same: to attain the Euro-Islamic fusion through the eradication of Israel or the dhimmitude of Europe. It is this ardent wish that is expressed in the texts of the Euro-Arab Dialogue, the Barcelona Declaration, the Dialogue of Civilizations, the Alliance of Civilizations and the letters written by high political personalities, ministers, veteran diplomats, Commissioners and high functionaries of the EU. A policy clothed in a doctrine of human rights that are nonetheless extremely selective. What are rights of Christians and other minorities in Muslim countries? Or those of Israelis attacked daily by Palestinian terrorists?

To justify its iniquitous policy towards Israel, the EU modifies the terminology. The lines of the 1949 cease-fire in a war of extermination against the State of Israel by five Arab armies, re-enforced by a militia from the Arab League composed of former Nazi and Italian soldiers, Balkan Muslim and Caucasian Muslim soldiers from dislocated Nazi armies - future Palestinian refugees of the Arab debacle - these lines are designated by Europe as international borders. It is through this illegal war that Egypt, Syria, and Jordan appropriated territories, having chased out and expropriated the ancient Jewish communities of Judea. 

The names of Judea and Samaria, thousands of years old, have been replaced by "West Bank" or "occupied Arab territories". A process of Islamizing the geography and the history of the people of Israel that could easily be reproduced in Europe. After forty years of a hidden Euro-Arab war to replace Israel with Arab and Islamic Palestine, we should not be surprised at the UNESCO Declaration that quite simply erases the three-thousand-year old history of the people of Israel through the adoption of a Koranic narrative that Islamizes Biblical personages. That an organization that proclaims itself to be the cultural conscience of humanity can deny the veracity of pharaonic, Babylonian, Greek and Roman sources that confirm this history is terrifying. For we have now arrived at the edge of an abyss of ignominy, not to mention the chasms swallowing up billions of dollars with, as a result, the abolition of the very meaning of culture. What can one say about the silence of the two and a half billion Christians indifferent to the suppression of their own history. For if the history of Israel, that through Jesus the Jew became the sacred heritage of Christianity, never existed, on what base does Christianity itself rest? Is it not forced to renounce the very substance of its civilization and its spirituality?

The adoption by Europe of the historical standards of the Koran reveals the Islamization of our leaders' way of thinking. Christianity, like Israel, is condemned to disappear, replaced by Islam. Hence the abandoning of Christians of the Near East, collateral victims of the Islamization of the West. The denial of the historicity of Israel implies the denial of Christianity. Islam and the Muslim Jesus are proclaimed. The war being waged by those nostalgic for Vichy and Nazism, allies of the Grand Mufti, is not limited to just destroying the legitimacy of Israel. It attacks the very foundation of Christianity.

There exists excellent commentary interspersed in the text of this letter by the author of this indispensable website;



http://galliawatch.blogspot.com/2016/06/bat-yeor-explains-why-great-replacement.html