The Sins that cry to Heaven for Vengeance Expounded.
Q. HOW many such sins are there?
Q. What is the first of them?
A. Wilful murder, which is a voluntary and unjust taking away another's life. (Abortion)
Q. How show you the pravity of this sin?
A. Out of Gen. iv. 10. Where it is said to Cain "What hast thou done? the voice of the blood of thy brother crieth to me from the earth: now, therefore shalt thou be cursed upon the earth." And Matt. xxvi 52, "All that take the sword, shall perish with the sword."
Q. What is the second?
A. The sin of Sodom, (So-called gay marriage) or carnal sin against nature, which is a voluntary shedding of the seed of nature, out of the due use of marriage, or lust with a different sex.
Q. What is the scripture proof of this?
A. Out of Gen. xix. 13. where we read of the Sodomites, and their sin. "We will destroy this place because the cry of them hath increased before our Lord, who hath sent us to destroy them," (and they were burnt with fire from heaven.)
Q. What is the third?
A. Oppressing of the poor, (low wages of immigrants/Usury)which is a cruel, tyrannical, and unjust dealing with inferiors.
Q. What other proof have you of that?
A. Out of Exod. xxii. 21. "Ye shall not hurt the widow and the fatherless: If you do hurt them, they will cry unto me, and I will hear them cry, and my fury shall take indignation, and I will strike thee with the sword." And out of Isa. x. 1, 2. "Wo to them that make unjust laws, that they might oppress the poor in judgment, and do violence to the cause of the humble of my people."
Q. What is the fourth?
A. To defraud working men of their wages, which is to lessen, or detain it from them. (Usury, Low wages)
Q. What proof have you of it?
A. Out of Eccl. xxxiv. 37. "He that sheddeth blood and he that defraudeth the hired man, are brethren," and out of James v. 4. "Behold the hire of the workmen that have reaped your fields, which is defrauded by you, crieth, and their cry hath entered into the ears of the Lord God of Sabaoth."
We all know Franciscus desired the Church dispense Holy Communion to adulterers and he infamously manipulated the Synodal process to get what he desired and then issued his exhortation, AMORIS LÆTITIA, in which that act is approved.
And most men know that a Dubia has been sent to Franciscus exhorting him to speak clearly on this heterodoxy but he is not going to do that and so what is this exercise all about anyways?
Faithful Catholics know it is wrong to dispense Holy Communion to Adulterers and the idea the Pope does not know that is laughable.
One may as well ask the President of MIT if 2 + 2 = 4 after he had dropped acid and declaimed that 2+ 2 = 5.
What is the point of all this? We all know the answer.
Faithful Catholics know the labile Lutheran of the Holy See is jake with dispensing Holy Communion to adulterers (it was his idea) and that there is more and worse to come.
There is not one damn thing that is going to happen to Franciscus, unless the Good Lord intervenes directly. He is Pope and he will remain Pope even if he were to say that Jesus became sin.
What's that? O, yeah, Franciscus has already said that publicly and not one Cardinal corrected him (by referencing the Hypostatic Union) or identified his Luciferian Lutheran Theology. If they let him lie about Jesus you think dispensing Holy Communion is a big deal in comparison to that?
Besides, the Catholic Church allows public usurers to receive Holy Communion; the Catholic Church allows public sodomites to receive Holy Communion; the Catholic Church allows public abortion supporters to receive Holy Communion; and the Catholic Church allows industrialists who pay illegal aliens illegal and immoral wages to receive Holy Communion and so if they who represent the Four Sins Crying to Heaven for Vengeance are allowed to receive Holy Communion, what is the big deal about allowing adulterers to also receive Holy Communion?
What, you think the cardinals will follow through with a procedure so arcane and recondite that only nine trads are aware of it?
The vast majority of Catholics will dutifully follow the labile Lutheran directly into Hell if they think it will avoid a scandal and their personal discomfort.
ALL of these petitions, dubias, etc. amount to a hill of Mexican Jumping Beans - attention getting but, ultimately, directionless.
Franciscus has the power and he ain't letting go of it and the Cardinals ain't got the cojones to do what is required anymore than the Bishops during Vatican Two dared to walk-out of the Council and refuse to allow a revolution within the form of Catholicism.
No, we have become the Church of documents and procedures to be followed and conservative Catholics have forever been petitioning for this and that and pleading for the other thing when they should have just maintained what they were doing within Tradition and refused to submit to the diktats of the revolutionaries.
The Shadow Church (it lacks substance) is a Deuce and a Quarter whereas the still existing, but invisibilium, Catholic Church is a Cadillac.