Far less than meets the eye

My photo
Ecumenism is the Universal Solvent of Tradition .

The fuss about Hus was unjust?




What'n'hell is this supposed to mean?  Other than an implied criticism of the bad judgmental church prior to V2, what is the point?


Pope appoints envoy for 600th anniversary of John Hus' death












Bring out your dead so we can apologise...


2015-05-02 Vatican Radio

(Vatican Radio) Pope Francis has appointed Cardinal Miloslav Vlk, Archbishop Emeritus of Prague, to be his special envoy to the July 5-6 events in Prague, marking the 600th anniversary of the death of John Hus (1369-1415).
In an address to the International Symposium on John Hus in 1999, St John Paul II said the Bohemian church reformer, who was condemned of heresy and burnt at the stake, was a "memorable figure," particularly for "his moral courage in the face of adversity and death." 
"On the eve of the Great Jubilee, I feel obliged to express deep regret for the cruel death inflicted on John Hus and the resulting wound, a source of conflict and division which was thus opened in the minds and hearts of the Bohemian people,” said St John Paul II. 

(But, what about the evil-mongering bastid, Hus, and his attack on Divine Revelation and Catholic Church authority and all of the damage wrought by the Protestant Revolution?)
Hus was born in the Kingdom of Bohemia (now Czech Republic). He was ordained a priest in 1400, and preached reformation in the Church. 

(He peached revolutionary violence)

He was a supporter of some of John Wycliffe’s teachings and was eventually excommunicated, condemned of heresy and killed. His followers came to be known as Hussites. 
St John Paul II said "the effort that students can develop to reach a deeper and full understanding of historical truth” was of “crucial importance.”
“Faith has nothing to fear from the commitment of historical research, since the research is also, ultimately, reaching out to the truth that has its source in God," he continued.
"A figure like John Hus, who was a major point of contention in the past, can now become a subject of dialogue, discussion and common study" in the hope that decisive steps can "be made on the path of reconciliation and true unity in Christ," the late pope said.
Cardinal Vlk was the architect of a commission, established in 1993, to study the life, work and person of John Hus.

For a different perspective on history (not the Whig history of Black Legends) we at ABE Ministry like to consult Dr. E. Michael Jones and his great opus, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History.

In Chapter Five, The Revolution arrives in Europe, we  are introduced to a treatment of this judaising bastid that is quite different than the ones which will appear in an attempt to airbrush reality away in the service of ecumenism.

So, what about this courageous man ?

Will the facts developed by Dr. Jones be included as part of this putative dialogue?

Hus supplied the rhetorical weapons that justified the nobility's theft of Catholic Church property and which actions were a foreshadowing of what that fat mephitic pantload, Henry VIII, did to the Catholic Church in Perfidious Albion.

Hus was a devotee of the execrable John Wycliffe (Have we apologised to him yet?) and Hus hissed his derivative doctrines all over the damn place as professor and priest.

And like the putrid Puritans who led us to secede (Yes, Virginia, secession was once not only permissible but praiseworthy) from the English Crown, Hus was preaching the putative holiness of the State (regnum for him) which was to be salvific and he preached this because he was a judaised protestant who smuggled the old testament ideas back into Christendom and which ideas are still dominant in America today and as can be seen when even the  mulatto macrologist, The POTUS, speaks about America as the exceptional nation.

Hus had this cute little idea that his doctrine that Bohemia was a Holy Nation ought be spread by the sword and so he blossomed into a preacher of violence:

The time has come for us...just as it did for Moses in the Old Testament, to take up our swords and defend the law of God (Against the Pope and Catholic Church).

In connection with this malign insanity, Dr. Jones quotes the famous Jewish historian, Heinrich Graetz:

fired a multitude in Bohemia, who entered a life and death struggle with Catholicism. Whenever a party in Christendom opposes itself to the ruling church, it assumes a tinge of the Old Testament, not to say Jewish spirit. The Hussites regarded Catholicism, not unjustly as heathenism, and themselves as Israelites, which must wage a holy war against Philistines, moabites, and Ammonites. Church and monasteries were to them the sanctuaries of a dissolute idolatry, temples to Baal and Moloch and groves of Astaroth to be consumed with fire and sword..

On second thought, don't bring out your dead. The ONLY thing we need to know about the bastid, Hus, is that he got what was coming to him.

The sad thing is, nothing similar like that is being done to the judasing bastids of today who are allowed, if not welcomed and encouraged, to spread their deadly diseases amongst the innocent flock of sheep.

I guess it is thought an action too mean to protect them from the Hus-like wolves the way a Good Shepherd would. 

O, and get a load of this: the estimable Dr. Jones produces a few sentences of profound insight that ought to make our modern Magisterium think before acting in a way that tends to apologise or explain away the malign actions of this malicious miscreant and the horrific consequences of his revolutionary acts:

Roughly four centuries later, St. Augustine would propose the definitive interpretation of those passages in the City of God. The book of Revelation was understood not in a literal historical sense but as a spiritual allegory. The Millennium had begun with Christ's death on the Cross and would continue until the Second Comming, when the Antichrist would reign for three and a half years before Christ returned in glory to judge the living and the dead and end time human history. To consider the Millennium as anything other than the dispensation of the New Israel, the Catholic Church, was declared a heresy and superstitious aberration by the Council of Ephesus in 431....

There is another interpretation of Revelations 20. Those who refused to succumb to the persecutions of the fourth beast, made up Rome, and reigned for literally one thousand years - the period between Alaric's sack of Rome in 1410, the date conventionally given for the fall of Rome, and the first outbreak of revolution in Europe, when Hus was excommunicated and gave his revolutionary sermon at the Bethlehem Chapel in 1410.

Guess what beast it was being born in that Bethlehem in the heart of Christendom?  The Anti-Christ, via the religious liberty of the judaised protestants and their revolution, was publicly rising in Europe and we are going to celebrate one of the beast's midwives.

We will rhetorically cast a shroud over those events and, this is guaran-damn-teed - apologise for our actions owing to the ideology of Religious Liberty which is supposed to grant such evil men the right to publicly preach their beliefs even when such actions lead to complete and utter devastation.  

We musn't trample on the putative dignity of these demented demons.

* All of this will have the air of an absurd attempt to rewrite history so the magisterium of today will seem, by comparison with the mean old Church of yesterday, as the friend of one and all - especially its enemies.

To a Traditionalist all of this will be as convincing as it was to his friends in Springfield, Vermont when Raider Fan put a dime in his Penny Loafers and told them that was proof he was descended from European Royalty.